Simone Biles: Blog| Charlie kirk post| What did charlie kirk say about

Introduction

Simone Biles is one of the most decorated gymnasts in history. Aside from her athletic achievements, she has also become a figure often caught between sports, media, mental health, and political culture wars. One particularly controversial aspect involves remarks made by conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. What did he say about her? How did people react? And what’s the truth about recent viral claims? In this article we’ll unpack all of this: the original remarks, the context, later developments, and what’s true vs. what’s been misrepresented.

Who Are the Key Players?

• Simone Biles – U.S. gymnast, multiple Olympic & world champion, widely regarded as one of the greatest in her sport. Her decisions, especially regarding mental health, have drawn both admiration and criticism.

• Charlie Kirk – Founder of Turning Point USA, a political commentator and activist. Known for strong conservative commentary, often about culture, identity, and national pride.

The Original Incident: Tokyo Olympics, 2021

In 2021, during the Tokyo Summer Olympics, a major moment of contention arose when Simone Biles withdrew from the women’s team gymnastics final, citing mental health concerns. She later also pulled out of other events, including the all-around final. Many, including her teammates and supporters, defended her decision, pointing to the pressure, the mental load, and a phenomenon she experienced called “the twisties” (a disorienting mental block during aerial skills).

Charlie Kirk responded harshly. According to multiple media sources:

• He called her a “selfish sociopath.”

• He said she was “immature.”

• He said she was “a shame to the country.”

• He criticized her presence in the competition under those circumstances, arguing that if someone has mental health issues, perhaps they shouldn’t compete. Kirk said things like “We are raising a generation of weak people like Simone Biles.”

These comments drew widespread backlash from athletes, mental health advocates, fans, and the public, many pointing out that mental health is not a choice, that athletes are human, and that pressure at that level can be overwhelming.

Context Matters: Mental Health & Athlete Pressure

To understand why Kirk’s remarks caused so much uproar, you have to understand where Simone Biles was coming from:

• Mental Health in Elite Sports: It’s increasingly recognized that the pressure on elite athletes is not just physical but deeply mental. Issues like anxiety, depression, PTSD, “the twisties,” etc., have become more openly discussed in recent years.

• Simone’s History and Publicity: Biles was not just competing—her status, public scrutiny, expectations, media, sponsors, etc., all amplified the pressure. Her decision to prioritize mental health has been defended by many as courageous.

• Social and Racial Dimensions: Some critics and commentators have argued that often black women face harsher criticism in public life, especially when they are outspoken or when their choices challenge expected norms. Simone’s decision, and the responses, can’t be wholly separated from these dynamics.

What Charlie Kirk Said, in Direct Quotes

Here are some of the key direct quotes attributed to Charlie Kirk concerning Simone Biles after her Tokyo withdrawals:

• “We are raising a generation of weak people like Simone Biles.”

• “She’s totally a sociopath.”

• “What kind of person skips the gold medal match? Who does that?”

• “She’s immature and she’s a shame to the country.”

These remarks reflect intense criticism—not only of her action (withdrawing) but of her character.

Reaction & Aftermath

• Public Backlash: Many people condemned Kirk’s comments as insensitive, especially given what Simone described about her mental health. Mental health professionals, other athletes, fans and media generally responded that these criticisms lacked empathy.

• Support for Biles: She received public support from many corners: fellow gymnasts, sports organizations, former Olympians. Many said prioritizing mental health was not only brave but necessary.

• Broader Culture Debate: This event intensified debates around sports culture, mental health, and national expectations. What does it mean for an athlete to compete under pressure? What is reasonable to expect? Where is the line between national pride and human well-being?

Recent Claims & Misinformation

More recently, after Charlie Kirk’s death in 2025, there have been viral social media claims that Simone Biles wrote a blog mocking his death, or made a “raw” emotional post about him. These claims are false. Multiple fact-checking articles have debunked them. Key points:

• No verified blog post or statement by Simone Biles has been published that mocks Charlie Kirk after his death.

• The viral Facebook posts making these claims appear fabricated or satirical.

• The misinformation spread quickly due to emotional and political charge, but there is no credible evidence that she made any such post.

Analysis: What to Make of It

Putting together the facts, here are some takeaways:

1. Criticism vs. Empathy: Kirk’s remarks show how some commentators view mental health through the lens of toughness or national symbolism rather than human struggle. Many believe this is unfair to athletes.

2. The Role of Public Figures: When someone of Kirk’s platform speaks publicly, their words carry weight—and sometimes, consequences. Criticism of mental health decisions can perpetuate stigma.

3. Misinformation is Fast: After Kirk’s death, rumors about Biles writing mocking posts highlight how easily unverified claims can spread, especially when people are emotional or polarized.

4. Changing Norms: There’s a shift in how society views athlete welfare. In earlier eras, withdrawing due to mental health might have been almost unthinkable or met with derision. Now, more people are supportive of protection and empathy—though the cultural tensions remain.

Conclusion

Charlie Kirk’s statements about Simone Biles—calling her a “selfish sociopath,” criticizing her withdrawal from Olympic events, saying she was “immature,” “weak,” and “a shame to the country”—remain a highly controversial episode. They occurred in the context of Simone’s decision to prioritize her mental health during the Tokyo Olympics. While many condemned his remarks, there has also been significant support for Biles, both in 2021 and since. Furthermore, recent claims that Simone posted a blog mocking Kirk after his death have been shown to be false.

In the end, this isn’t just a story about one athlete and one commentator—it’s part of a larger conversation about mental health, public expectation, justice, and how society treats those who step forward about personal limits.

FAQs

1. Did Charlie Kirk and Simone Biles ever have a personal interaction?
   There is no public record of a direct, personal confrontation. The interaction has been via media, podcasts, social media—mostly Kirk commenting on Biles’ actions and Biles responding or people reacting around that.

2. Why did Simone Biles withdraw from the 2021 Olympics events?
   She cited mental health concerns, especially dealing with “the twisties”—a state where gymnasts lose spatial awareness during aerial skills, which can be extremely dangerous. She said she was not having fun, and also felt she was competing partly for others rather than for herself.

3. Has Simone Biles publicly responded to Charlie Kirk’s comments?
   While Simone Biles has spoken about her mental health and defended her decision, there is no widely documented instance of her replying directly at length to every criticism from Charlie Kirk.

4. Are there any verified statements from Simone mocking Charlie Kirk after his death?
   No. Claims of her posting a mocking blog post or statement are not supported by credible evidence and have been debunked by multiple fact-checking outlets.

5. What was the public’s reaction to Chad Kirk’s criticism?
   Mixed, but mostly negative toward Kirk’s style. Many praised Biles’ courage, emphasized mental health, and criticized the lack of empathy. Others echoed views about national expectations, performance, etc.

6. What can be learned from this case?

   • Mental health in sports needs more understanding and support.

   • High expectations shouldn’t override human well-being.

   • Be cautious about believing viral social media claims without verification.

   • Public figures have power in shaping discourse.